The Case Against Nuclear Power, Rocky Mountain Institute (RMI)
RMI’s Lovins
highlights four problems with nuclear that keep it from competing against
cheaper, swifter rivals such as cogeneration, wind and energy efficiency that
also do no have nuclear’s security and proliferation
problems:
http://www.rmi.org/sitepages/pid504.php
Tools for Sustainable Design
Each year, the
http://bet.rmi.org/rmi-news/tools-for-sustainable-design.html
C07-08, Profitable Solutions For Oil, Climate, and
Proliferation (PDF-196k) "What Can We Do To Fix The Climate Problem?"
Comparison of Life-Cycle Analyses of
Compact Fluorescent and
Incandescent Lamps Based on Rated Life of
Compact Fluorescent Lamp
This paper addresses
the debate over compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs) and incandescents through life-cycle analyses (LCA) conducted
in the SimaPro1 life-cycle analysis program. It compares the
environmental impacts of providing a given amount of light (approximately 1,600
lumens) from incandescents and CFLs
for 10,000 hours. Special attention has been paid to recently raised concerns
regarding CFLs—specifically that their complex
manufacturing process uses so much energy that it outweighs the benefits of
using CFLs, that turning CFLs
on and off frequently eliminates their energy-efficiency benefits, and that
they contain a large amount of mercury. The
research
shows that the efficiency benefits compensate for the added complexity in
manufacturing, that while rapid on-off cycling of the lamp does reduce the
environmental (and payback) benefits of CFLs they
remain a net “win,” and that the mercury emitted over a CFL’s
life—by power plants to power the CFL and by leakage on disposal—is still less
than the mercury that can be attributed to powering the incandescent