Trash Incineration- Documentation on Adverse Health Effects and Economic Considerations

Resources Promoting Waste Minimization and Opposing Incineration, PSR,
(http://www.psr.org/chapters/oregon/resources/waste-min-opp-incin.html)

Extensive, well-documented reasons and options exist for communities to conserve their resources, minimize their municipal and medical wastes, avoid or phase out incineration, and reduce and minimize landfills.  By embracing such options communities will conserve resources, create jobs, reduce pollutants and global warming gases emitted into the environment, reduce health impairment and health care costs, and reduce direct and indirect financial threats to citizens, businesses, governments, etc.


 Wasted Energy - Debunking the Waste-to-Energy Scheme, Neil Seldman, E-Magazine, July/August 2008

http://www.ilsr.org/columns/2008/080008.html

Energy from Waste: Part 1 - The Myths Debunked - Paul Connett  Video 10:00  2007

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XB5iOtxlpCs

Incineration and Nanoparticles - Paul Connett  Video  2:43  2007

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zm9YzhOrB9Q

Cost of Emissions and Ash pollution from Incineration or Coal Facilities

www.flcv.com/cap.html

 

Despite the latest spin, there is nothing better about burning garbage
today, whether in the U.S. or in Denmark (1). Attempts to peddle "waste
to energy" haven't gained wide acceptance around the world because
people are aware that incineration:

1.    Remains a serious threat to public health
<http://www.cawdrec.com/incineration/CVH.pdf>. Burning garbage is a
primary source of cancer-causing dioxins and other pollutants that enter
the food supply and concentrate up through the food chain.

2.    Produces more carbon dioxide per unit of electricity than coal
power. Current atmospheric carbon loads cannot safely bear additional
emissions from incinerators and landfills
<http://no-burn.org/article.php?id=339>.

3.    Is a massive waste of energy. Due to its low calorific value,
burning garbage to produce energy is highly inefficient (2).  
Conversely, recycling recovers three to five times more energy than
incineration <http://www.springerlink.com/content/m423181w2hh036n4/>
produces.

4.    Creates an economic burden for communities.
<http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D9F11AS80.htm> Billions of
taxpayer dollars are spent subsidizing the construction and operations
of incinerators. For a fraction of this cost
<http://www.emagazine.com/view/?4601>, investments in recycle, reuse and
remanufacture, create significantly more business and employment
opportunity.

5.    Represents the destruction of valuable resources and jobs. Zero
waste practices create over 10 times the number of jobs
<http://www.ilsr.org/recycling/> than burning or burying the same waste.
Over ninety per cent of municipal waste can be recycled, re-used or
composted, to create thousands of good, long-term jobs.

As part of their marketing, incinerator lobby groups have even recruited
the same "expert" witnesses that once testified for the tobacco industry
<http://www.no-burn.org/article.php?id=832>.  Fortunately, citizen
groups today are not easily deceived by such masquerades and are
familiar with real solutions.

The next time the NY Times looks at gleaning information from industry
websites, I would encourage you to diligently question the source.

Footnotes:

1. According to Eurostat in 2007, Denmark produces the highest waste per
capita (over 1762 lbs. per person each year) in the EU -- clearly an
unsustainable level of waste generation. Additionally, over 80 % of what
is burned in Danish incinerators is recyclable/compostable.

2. State of the art incineration plants in Denmark achieve only 25%
energy efficiency with heat and power


Ananda Lee Tan
North American Program Coordinator
Global Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives
1958 University Avenue, Berkeley, Ca 94703
Phone: +1 510 883 9490 Ext 102
Email: ananda@no-burn.org
Website: www.no-burn.org

 

 HAZARDS OF MEDICAL WASTE INCINERATION, PSR, http://www.psr.org/chapters/oregon/assets/pdfs/hazards-of-medical-waste.pdf

 


_http://www.psr.org/chapters/oregon/assets/pdfs/hazards-of-medical-waste.pdf
_
(http://www.psr.org/chapters/oregon/assets/pdfs/hazards-of-medical-waste.pdf)

Addressing Toxic Chemical Influences on Developmental Disabilities, PSR,

www.psr.org/chapters/boston/resources/in-harms-way.html

Learning, behavioral and developmental disabilities including Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and autism prevent our children from reaching their full human potential. Seventeen percent of children in the United States have been diagnosed with one or more developmental disabilities. These disorders have widespread societal implications, from health and education costs to the repercussions of criminal behavior. Though trends are difficult to establish with certainty, there is a growing consensus that learning and behavioral disorders are increasing in frequency. Research demonstrates that pervasive toxic substances, such as mercury, lead, PCBs, dioxins, pesticides, solvents, and others, can contribute to neurobehavioral and cognitive disorders. Human exposure to neurotoxic substances is widespread

Biomass Incinerator Ash

Biomass Ash has varying levels of toxic metals depending on the fuel source and area the fuel was grown.  The primary concerns are the levels of cadmium, mercury, and lead.  Cadmium levels are often problematic, and mercury can also be high, averaging 1.9 parts per million in fly ash in one study.   Much of the mercury in wood waste is in emissions, but can also be high in ash, where mercury is concentrated by as much as a factor of 40 compared to the fuel stock level. Ash with significant levels of toxic metals must be treated as toxic waste.

From waste to raw material—the route from biomass to wood ash for                                                         cadmium  and other heavy metals;  M. Narodoslawsky and I. ObernbergerCorresponding Author Contact Information

Institute for Chemical Engineering, Graz University of Technology, Inffeldgasse 25, A-8010, Graz, Austria      accepted 21 February 1996.   Available online 20 March 1998.

Abstract

Energetic utilization of biomass is considered an environmentally safe way of providing energy, especially for process heat and district- heating purposes. The main advantage of energy from biomass is the CO2-neutrality of this energy-production process. However, this process produces a solid by-products, namely ash, that has to be considered. This ash contains nutrients like calcium, potassium and phosphorus that should be recycled to forest or agricultural soils, thus closing not only the carbon cycle but also the fluxes of mineral materials caused by these technologies. The problem is, however, that besides nutrients, the ash also contains heavy metals. Cadmium poses a special risk to the use of wood ash in agriculture. It pollutes a large fraction of the ash generated in a biomass combustion plant, namely the cyclone fly-ash and, to an even higher degree, the filter fly-ash or (where flue gas condensation is installed) the condensation sludge. A medium-term solution to the recycling of solid residues from biomass combustion is blending cyclone fly-ash and bottom ash and using the mixture in agriculture. Although a large part of nutrients might be recycled in this manner, care has to be taken of the relatively high amount of cadmium in this material. A new technology currently under development takes advantage of the different temperatures in a biomass combustion plant. This technology enables concentration of cadmium (and other volatile heavy metals) in a very small portion of the whole ash flux from a plant and the concentrations of environmentally relevant substances in the remainder of the ash is kept low. In this manner, wood ash from the process industry or district heating systems might be transformed from waste to raw material for agricultural use.


Farber Medical Solutions, LLC

1285 Wood Ave.

Bridgeport, CT 06604

Attn.: Stewart Farber, MS Public Health

[203] 441-8433 - office

[203] 522-2817 - mobile

[203] 367-0791 - fax

website: www.farber-medical.com

email: farber@farber.info


 

 

 

Greenfield Zoning Board of Appeals
14 Court Square
Greenfield, MA 01370  

ALKALI DEPOSITS FOUND IN BIOMASS POWER PLANTS

www.trmiles.com/alkali/alkali.htm#EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Alkali in the ash of annual crop biomass fuels creates serious fouling and slagging in conventional boilers. Even with the use of sorbents and other additives, power plants can only fire limited amounts of these fuels in combination with wood. The National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), U. S. Department of Energy, and the biomass power industry carried out eight full-scale firing tests and several laboratory experiments to study the nature and occurrence of deposits with the goal of increasing the quantities of these biofuels that can be used. This report describes the results of the laboratory and power plant tests that included: tracking and analyzing fuels and deposits by various methods; recording operating conditions; and extensive laboratory testing.

The handbook of biomass combustion and co-firing (Cd)

http://books.google.com/books?id=KE565zmFumQC&pg=PA366&lpg=PA366&dq=biomass+plant+wood+ash&source=bl&ots=wHy7Chbicw&sig=r4ZpZVOnPLwOrzaH9W01849NnUU&hl=en&ei=yduzS4WJCcO78ga_kqC8Ag&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=7&ved=0CCQQ6AEwBjgK#v=onepage&q=biomass%20plant%20wood%20ash&f=false

 

Letter to Ed (Dear Sirs,)

 

I request that this letter and any information attached to it be added to the public record.

 

I am an environmental radiation monitoring scientist [A.B.  Brown University in Chemistry, Master of Science in Public Health from UMASS Amherst in Air Pollution Control]. Professionally, I have been involved in conducting and assessing environmental radiation monitoring studies for over 20 years.

 

In the early 1990s, I initiated a study by radiation scientists all over the US who documented the levels of natural and man-made radioactivity in wood ash gathered from domestic wood burning of both hardwoods and softwoods from the East Coast to Georgia, South Carolina, Idaho, and California. 

 

The study was initiated by a Feature Article I authored to the Health Physics Society's Newsletter [Volume XVIII, No. 4] titled "Preliminary Study of Cs-137 [Cesium-137] Uptake by Trees and Its Implications for BRC, Waste Disposal, and Dosimetry].  The Health Physics Society is an International Society of over 5,000 radiation safety scientists involved in environmental, medical, and industrial radiation protection.

 

This initial study, noted above, documents the presence of radioactive Cs-137, a man-made radioactive isotope, in a small number of wood ash samples from around New England. My initial Article called for actual measurements of Cs-137 in wood ash to be measured since concentrations of man made Cs-137 were found to be quite variable. I measured one sample of wood ash from trees harvested near Warren, VT distant from any source of the release of radioactive Cs-137 from any industrial source of radioactivity. This first measurement in Warren, VT was 10 times higher than a wood ash sample from burning trees cut  down in Southern Vermont near the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station. This finding of higher Cs-137 in more Northern Vermont to levels 10 times lower in Southern Vermont shows how variable the concentration of radioactive Cs-137 can be in trees,  and how the resulting content of Cs-137 in wood ash could vary accordingly.

 

In this initial Article, I called for scientists all over the US to make Cs-137 measurements in wood ash to document then current levels, and to send the data to me to compile.  As background, Cs-137 was created and dispersed worldwide in the environment  primarily from the open air testing of atomic bombs by the United States and the former Soviet Union from the 1940s into the 1960s.  When radioactive Uranium-235 or Plutonium-238 is fissioned in the explosion of an atomic or hydrogen bomb, the  major amount of  radioactivity from long half life  fission products deposited in the environment is from Cesium-137 and Strontium-90. Both isotopes have a half life of about 30 years.   A half life of 30 years means that both Cs-137 and Sr-90 decline by a factor of about 2 every 30 years.

 

Data in my initial study clearly indicate that radioactive Cs-137 is present in wood ash samples gathered from all over the US. The highest average concentrations [in declining averages based on the samples analyzed] were measured in Maine, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Connecticut, Vermont, and Massachusetts.  Six samples analyzed in California were 50 times lower documenting how the higher measurements of Cs-137 were primarily seen in the Eastern US.

 

The results of this research were presented on October 21st, 1992 at the 5th Annual National Biofuels Conference,  which was  organized by the United States Environmental Protection Agency and other Federal and State environmental agencies and organizations.  I was an invited speaker at this Biofuels Conference,  and participated in a panel discussing the significance of radioactivity in wood ash to the use of biofuels. Radioactive Cs-137 levels in a sample as measured in 1991 will have declined by about 34% to the present.

 

A wood burning power plant represents an industrial process which brings very large quantities of wood [which contains radioactive Cs-137, Strontium-90, and a long list of natural radioactive isotopes at varying concentrations depending on the wood supply] and concentrates it in one location. This concentrated presence of radioisotopes, as present in the biomass, is upon combustion released into the stack gas emissions from the facility, and into the ash generated and disposed of by the biomass power plant either as a waste product, or as a fertilizer as a soil amendment.

 

The radioactivity present in wood ash or in the stack gas releases from industrial wood burning power generation using biomass has to my knowledge not been measured and assessed. However, there is no disputing that  both man made and natural radioactivity will be present in both the stack releases and in the ash. Both sources of release represent a pathway by which radioactivity can reach people and the environment in a more concentrated manner.

 

It is appropriate that any applicant proposing to build a 50 MW[e] wood burning power plant make a basic set of measurements to assess the radioactivity content of the wood which will be used to feed the boilers, of the Cs-137 which might be released in the stack gas emissions once the facility begins operation, and which will be present in the thousands of tons of  bottom and fly ash which will be disposed of in various ways. Only in this manner, will it be possible to characterize in a basic way what radiation exposure may result from the operation of a biomass fueled power plant.

 

Respectfully yours,
Stewart Farber, MS Public Health
Farber Medical Solutions, LLC
1285 Wood Ave.
Bridgeport, CT 06604   [203] 441-8433 [office]  [203] 522-2817 [cell]  [203] 367-0791 [fax]
website: www.farber-medical.com     email:    farber@farber.info

 

 Attachment:

Cesium-137 in Wood Ash -Results of Nationwide Survey, Stewart Farber, Consulting Scientist;  Presented at the 5th Annual National Biofuels Conference, Newton, MA; October 21, 1992    38 pages including Attachments

Mercury in Biomass Feedstock and Combustion Residuals;     Water, Air, & Soil Pollution,   Peter ThyContact Information and Bryan M. Jenkins2

(1) 

Department of Geology, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA

 

(2) 

Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA

Published online: 29 September 2009

Abstract  An exploratory survey of the mercury content of some common California biomass feedstocks shows that the concentrations are well below EPA toxicity levels with representative feedstock concentrations of 20 ppb for rice straw, 28 ppb for wheat straw, and 32 ppb for whole-tree wood chips. The temporal variability for rice straw (17–20 ppb) is near the analytical uncertainty (2 ppb). Saline-irrigated feedstock does not contain greatly higher mercury contents (17–38 ppb) compared to normally irrigated feedstock. Water leaching has likewise no detectable effects on mercury mobility, despite an up to 30% increase in the Hg concentrations attributable to mass losses during leaching. Combustion at temperatures of at least 575°C results in complete volatilization of mercury leaving solid ash and slag residuals

 with mercury contents at or near the lower limit of detection (5 ppb).

The mercury strongly concentrated in fly ash can reach concentrations up

 to 40 times (<1,166 ppb) the corresponding fuel concentrations.

Trace Metal Concentrations in Ashes from Various Types of Biomass Species  Author: Ayhan Demidotrbascedil a

Published in: journalEnergy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, Volume 25, Issue 7 July 2003 , pages 743 – 751  http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~content=a713849950&db=all

Abstract

In this study, toxic metal levels in selected samples of various biomass types—wood, wood bark, fruit shell, mushroom, and lichen—were determined. The samples were analyzed by atomic absorption spectrophotometrically for their toxic metal elements: As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Pb, and Hg. The maximum levels of As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Pb, and Hg were 4.118 mg/kg in beech trunk wood ash, 3.926 mg/kg in Cladonia rangiformis, 15.057 mg/kg in Lactarius piperatus, 92.488 mg/kg in Amanita muscaria, 40.832 mg/kg in beech trunk bark ash, and 0.718 mg/kg in Cladonia rangiformis, respectively, in all the samples. The problem of uptake and accumulation of these elements has environmental and toxicological aspects as well

 

  Range in elemental composition of industrial
wood ash samples and ground limestone.

Element

Wood Ash*

Limestone

Macroelements

Concentration in %

Calcium

15 (2.5-33)

31

Potassium

2.6 (0.1-13)

0.13

Aluminum

1.6 (0.5-3.2)

0.25

Magnesium

1.0 (0.1-2.5)

5.1

Iron

0.84 (0.2-2.1)

0.29

Phosphorus

0.53 (0.1-1.4)

0.06

Manganese

0.41 (0-1.3)

0.05

Sodium

0.19 (0-0.54)

0.07

Nitrogen

0.15 (0.02-0.77)

0.01

Microelements

Concentration in mg/kg

Arsenic

6 (3-10)

.

Boron

123 (14-290)

.

Cadmium *

3 (0.2-26)

0.7

Chromium

57 (7-368)

6.0

Copper

70 (37-207)

10

Lead *

65 (16-137)

55

Mercury *

1.9 (0-5)

.

Molybdenum

19 (0-123)

.

Nickel

20 (0-63)

20

Selenium

0.9 (0-11)

.

Zinc

233 (35-1250)

113

Other Chemical Properties

CaCO3 Equivalent

43% (22-92%)

100%

pH

10.4 (9-13.5)

9.9

% Total solids

75 (31-100)

100

* Mean and (Range) taken from analysis of 37 ash samples


By:

·         Mark Risse, Extension Engineering, 307 Hoke Smith Bldg., Athens 30602. 706-542-2154

·         Glen Harris, Extension Agronomist, P.O. Box 1209, Tifton 31793. 912-386-3194

http://hubcap.clemson.edu/~blpprt/bestwoodash.html

MSW Incinerators

The 160 MSW incinerators operating in the U.S. produce about 8 million tons of ash each year containing, by rough estimate, some 18,000 tons of lead, plus lesser quantities of other potent toxins such as cadmium, arsenic, mercury and dioxin.[ Assuming the 8 million tons are 90% bottom ash containing 2000 ppm lead and 10% fly ash containing 4000 ppm lead]  Ash containing 2000 ppm lead is contaminated at a level more than 5 times as high as the "level of concern" EPA recently set for lead in soil.

Hazardous waste can cost up to $300 per ton for burial at a legally-designated hazardous waste dump. Judi Enck of the New York Public Interest Research Group estimates that ash can be placed in an "ash monofill" for only $70 or $80 per ton.  (note: costs outdated)

Burning garbage is a major source of toxic pollutants
<http://www.epa.gov/ncea/pdfs/dioxin/2k-update/>
.    Burning garbage produces more climate pollution per unit of
electricity than coal power plants.
<http://www.epa.gov/cleanenergy/energy-and-you/affect/air-emissions.html>
.    Burning garbage is a huge economic burden for communities
<http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D9F11AS80.htm>

On the other hand
.    Most waste that is buried and burned can be recycled or composted
<http://www.sacbee.com/2009/12/20/2407629/viewpoints-dont-talk-trash-compost.html>,
generating more than 10 times the number of jobs than incinerators or
landfills.
.    If all the waste buried or burned were to be recycled and
composted, hundreds of thousands of good, long-term jobs
<http://apolloalliance.org/new-apollo-program/recology-pursues-zero-waste-in-bay-area/>
could be created while reducing a massive toxic burden for some of the
poorest communities in this country.

 RACHEL'S HAZARDOUS WASTE  News  #403,  1994,  www.ejnet.org/rachel/rehw403.htm

RACHEL'S HAZARDOUS WASTE NEWS #390   May 14, 1994 www.ejnet.org/rachel/rhwn390.htm

RACHEL'S HAZARDOUS WASTE NEWS #391 ---May 26, 1994--- www.ejnet.org/rachel/rhwn391.htm

RACHEL'S ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH WEEKLY #457 ---August 31, 1995--- www.ejnet.org/rachel/rehw457.htm

Rachel’s News   www.rachel.org/bulletin/index.cfm?St=4

Rachel’s News : Index   www.rachel.org/bulletin/index.cfm?St=4

  #797 -- Toxic Lead and Violence, August 05, 2004   www.rachel.org/bulletin/index.cfm?St=4

 769 -- Prenatal Exposures and Disease, May 15, 2003

  www.rachel.org/bulletin/index.cfm?St=4

#678 - ADHD and Children's Environment, December 02, 1999 

 www.rachel.org/bulletin/index.cfm?St=4

Toxic Metal Content of Coal Plant Ash   www.flcv.com/tmcoal.html