B. Windham, Research Director and President, DAMS International, firstname.lastname@example.org
Comments on Children’s Amalgam Study one:
Renal Effects of Dental Amalgam in Children", D.C. Bellinger et al, JAMA,
The study design was not a serious effort to determine amalgam safety. The study was an unethical use of a known highly toxic substance on children who were not fully informed or in a position to understand the implications. But the author’s interpretation of results is also questionable.
It is known from thousands of studies and millions of tests by medical labs that those with amalgam get significantly higher mercury exposure than those without, that mercury accumulates in the brain and major organs proportionately to the number of amalgam fillings, and commonly causes chronic degenerative neurological conditions later in life. http://www.flcv.com/damsindx.html
Thus the ethics in the exposure to a group of children to higher levels of a very neurotoxic substance such as mercury is highly questionable.
This study was not a serious test of the safety of amalgam since the exposure was to children with no previous amalgam fillings at relatively low levels of exposure for a very limited period of time. The mean number of restored amalgam surfaces in the mouth of the amalgam group at the end of the study was only algam surfaces. And while the urine mercury level in the amalgam group was 50% higher than the non-amalgam group, this is a much lower differential than most studies of groups or either children or adults with and without amalgams.
For more details see: www.flcv.com/hgchilds.html
Children’s Amalgam Study 2:
Comments on “Neurobehavioral Effects of
Dental Amalgam in Children”, T. A. De
Rouen, et al, JAMA,
In justifying the study design the author’s state on page 1 that “there is little or no evidence concerning health effects of low level mercury exposure from amalgam, especially in children”. In fact, there are over 3,000 peer-reviewed studies in the medical literature(3) that were submitted by parties in the FDA amalgam docket to the FDA (4), that document the mechanisms by which mercury(from amalgam) commonly causes over 30 chronic health conditions. And there are hundreds are peer-reviewed studies and clinical studies that document that many thousands of patients with these conditions have improved after amalgam replacement(2). While it is clear that hundreds of thousands (or millions) of children have had their health adversely affected by mercury, since there are multiple exposure mechanisms it’s not clear the extent to which dental amalgam is responsible (7).
But the main problem with the study design appears to be the choice of what conditions were tested for and the kinds of tests that were used. In describing why the chosen conditions were tested for and in what manner, the authors stated on page 2 of the study that the target organs for elemental mercury exposure from amalgam were identified to be the renal system and neurological functions(memory, attention/concentration, and motor/visuomotor). Actually, while there is documentation in the medical literature of many other types of health effects, there is little evidence in the literature on common renal effects.(1,2,3). And there are other types of health effects that have been well documented in the literature to be more commonly caused by mercury than attention or memory(though these also have been documented to be commonly caused by mercury exposure).
The referenced analysis shows that the basic assumptions that the authors say they based their study design on were not valid, and the study does not demonstrate what it has been suggested to demonstrate. For details and references, see: www.myflcv.com/hgchilds.html