(IS THIS THE END OF ACIP
TRANSPARENCY?;
DR. ROBERT MALONE SAYS HHS INSIDERS ARE
WORKING AGAINST LEADERSHIP; Children’s Health Defense Will Appeal Rulings in
High-Profile Vaccine Lawsuit; AARON SIRI: ICAN PUSHES MAJOR VACCINE REFORM; Courts
Are Turning on Government and Big Tech Collusion and Censorship; Biden Administration
Failed to Immediately Warn About Stroke Risk from Pfizer Vaccine;
FALSE
SCHIZOPHRENIC DIAGNOSES DRIVE ANTIPSYCHOTIC DRUG DISPENSING IN NURSING HOME
S
(Pharm
collusion);
Deliberately FLYING BLIND: FCC STILL USES OVER
30-YEAR-OLD EXPOSURE SAFETY LIMITS TO GREENLIGHT 6G RADIATION;
AI
EXPANSION RAISES QUESTIONS ON JOBS, POWER, AND SECURITY;
DR. PATRICK PORTER
ON BRAIN HEALTH IN A HIGH-STRESS WORLD)
Dr. Robert Malone breaking down the growing ACIP
controversy and the legal and political fallout surrounding the CDC vaccine
advisory committee.
mRNA vaccine pioneer Robert Malone, MD examines reports that the Advisory
Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) may be disbanded—a development that
could signal a major shift in U.S. vaccine policy. As a key advisory body to
the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), ACIP has long shaped
national immunization schedules and guided which vaccines are recommended
across the country.
Dr. Malone explains how ACIP’s influence extends far beyond recommendations,
impacting insurance coverage, school requirements, and federal vaccine
programs. Its potential removal raises critical questions about how future
vaccine decisions will be made, who will assume that authority, and what
standards will guide public health policy moving forward.
In a striking development, Dr. Malone also raises concerns about internal
dynamics within the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), alleging
that a “mole” inside the agency may be undermining the Secretary’s agenda. The
claim adds a new layer of tension to an already evolving landscape,
highlighting concerns about transparency, internal alignment, and
accountability within federal health institutions.
As scrutiny of public health agencies intensifies, these reported changes
are being viewed by some as a push for reform, while others see potential
disruption to long-standing systems. Looking ahead, Dr. Malone explores what
this could mean for vaccine development, authorization pathways, and informed
consent.
If ACIP’s role is diminished or eliminated, it may fundamentally reshape how
vaccines are evaluated and recommended in the United States, marking a
potential turning point in the future of public health policy.
As a judge
sides with the American Academy of Pediatrics against the new vaccine schedule
tied to Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and suspends appointments to Kennedy’s newly
selected committee members, Del and Dr. Malone examines what this means for
vaccine policy, public trust, and the future of medical freedom.
Children’s
Health Defense Will Appeal Rulings in High-Profile Vaccine Lawsuit
Children’s Health
Defense (CHD) said it will appeal U.S. District Judge Brian E. Murphy’s denial
of CHD’s motion to intervene in the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
lawsuit against HHS and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. CHD will also appeal Murphy’s
March 16 preliminary injunction that paused recent changes to vaccine policy
and prohibited CDC vaccine advisers from meeting.
While an activist court
is attempting to reverse RFK Jr’s progress at HHS, ICAN’s lead attorney Aaron
Siri took center stage in the heart of D.C., with an evening presentation and
discussion with Senator Ron Johnson at the Kennedy Center. He presented a damning
case against the entire vaccine paradigm before an influential audience
including federal employees, reps, and the press, that you
have
to
see to believe. Aaron breaks down the powerful
evening,
and
details his recommendations to reform this corrupt program for good.
ICAN lead attorney, Aaron Siri, joins Del Bigtree for an in-depth discussion
on efforts to reform the U.S. vaccine regulatory system and increase
transparency within federal health agencies—on the heels of the American
Academy of Pediatrics filing a lawsuit against the Department of Health and
Human Services.
A federal judge has since issued a preliminary injunction, temporarily
blocking recent HHS actions and invalidating decisions made by a newly
appointed Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) panel—effectively
freezing proposed changes to the nation’s vaccine schedule while the case moves
forward.
Drawing on years of litigation and government record requests, Siri explains
how legal battles have exposed internal decision-making at agencies like the
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Food and Drug
Administration, raising new questions about how vaccine safety is evaluated,
monitored, and communicated to the public.
ICAN has also taken direct action, filing a formal petition with the HHS
Secretary to add more than 300 reported injuries to the federal Vaccine Injury
Compensation Program (VICP) table, as required under the 1986 National
Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. In addition, ICAN has submitted proposed charter
language for ACIP, aimed at strengthening transparency, accountability, and
adherence to statutory requirements in how vaccine recommendations are
developed.
Siri outlines broader proposals to improve oversight of vaccine approval and
recommendation processes, including strengthening clinical trial standards,
increasing transparency in safety monitoring systems, and restoring informed
consent in medical decision-making. The conversation also explores how mounting
legal challenges—including the AAP’s lawsuit and the court-ordered
pause—reflect a broader shift in how federal health institutions are being
scrutinized.
As pressure builds from multiple fronts, Siri and Del examine how legal action and structural reform could reshape how vaccines are tested, recommended, and regulated in the United States.
In a
major legal development, courts have delivered a decisive ruling against
government-backed social media censorship during the COVID-19 era, marking what
many are calling a landmark victory for the First Amendment. This case,
involving federal agencies such as the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) and the Office of the Surgeon General, found that government
pressure on tech platforms to suppress certain viewpoints crossed
constitutional boundaries. The settlement now restricts these agencies from
coercing or threatening social media companies over protected speech,
reinforcing that digital platforms do not alter fundamental free speech
protections.
The ruling goes further, clarifying that labeling content
as
misinformation,
disinformation
, or
malinformation
does not strip it of constitutional protection, a critical point in the
broader debate over online censorship and government overreach. Internal
communications released during the case revealed extensive coordination between
public health officials and major tech companies, including Meta Platforms, raising
new questions about the role of Big Tech in moderating public discourse. For
many, this decision represents a turning point in the ongoing fight for
transparency, accountability, and the preservation of open dialogue in the
digital age.
At the same time, courts are increasingly weighing in on
vaccine mandates and religious exemptions, with multiple rulings affirming the
legal strength of religious accommodation claims. Recent cases against
hospitals and employers, including actions supported by the U.S. Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission, have resulted in financial penalties for
failing to honor religious objections to COVID-19 vaccination requirements.
These outcomes signal a growing legal framework supporting informed consent,
individual rights, and protections against compelled medical interventions.
Meanwhile, a wave of lawsuits targeting major tech
companies is gaining momentum, with
juries
finding
platforms liable for harms related to content moderation, child safety, and
social media addiction. High-profile cases against companies like Meta
Platforms and YouTube suggest a broader legal reckoning may be underway—some
are comparing this to past industry-defining litigation. As hundreds of cases
move forward and new legislation emerges at the state level, these developments
point to a rapidly evolving legal landscape shaping the future of free speech,
public health policy, and Big Tech accountability in America.
After a four-year legal battle, the
plaintiffs in the key censorship case,
Missouri v. Biden
, scored a free
speech victory. This is the first real, operational restraint on the federal
censorship machine, according to Missouri Sen. Eric Schmitt, who served as the
state’s attorney general when the case was filed.
Senator Ron Johnson
received
nearly 2,000 pages of records
showing that there was a known safety concern associated with the
Pfizer-BioNTech bivalent COVID-19 vaccine that was not disclosed to the public.
Senator Johnson alleges that the Biden administration
downplayed
the statistically significant
risk of ischemic stroke while simultaneously reviewing the potential harms
without notifying the public.
The safety signal was detected in October 2022
for individuals over 65 and persisted across multiple vaccine safety databases
for months, yet the administration didn’t issue any public health alerts or
change the booster recommendation guidelines.
A pharma-created culture of prescribing
antipsychotic drugs off-label to dementia patients in nursing homes is still
happening today, according to a new
report
from the Office of the Inspector General (OIG). The OIG
report revealed that some nursing homes intentionally and wrongfully diagnosed
residents as having schizophrenia so they could give anti-psychotic medications
without negatively impacting their star rating.
More of the Collusion That’s Harming Public
Jefferey Jaxen reports
on accelerating AI disruption as Palantir CEO Alex Karp warns of major
disruption across society, industry, and global power. What does the AI
revolution mean for your future, your work, and the speed of change now
underway?
Jefferey Jaxen investigates the rapidly expanding influence of artificial
intelligence and the growing concerns surrounding its impact on society, the
economy, and global power structures.
As governments and corporations race to deploy increasingly powerful AI
systems, the technology is transforming industries, automating jobs, and
reshaping how information is created and distributed. While some see AI as a
driver of unprecedented innovation and productivity, others warn it could
deepen economic inequality, concentrate control among a handful of tech giants,
and introduce new forms of digital influence.
Concerns are also intensifying around AI’s role in national security.
Leaders in the field, including Alex Karp of Palantir Technologies, have openly
stated that their platforms are designed to support military operations,
including targeting and eliminating enemies—highlighting the growing
intersection between AI development and modern warfare.
At the same time, new research suggests that people are often able to
distinguish between human-created and AI-generated content, raising questions
about authenticity and trust in an increasingly synthetic information
landscape. Paradoxically, studies also indicate that workers who rely on AI
tools frequently report feeling an increased workload, challenging the
assumption that automation will simply make jobs easier.
As AI becomes more deeply embedded in everyday life, Jefferey asks whether
society is truly prepared for the cultural, economic, and intellectual shifts
ahead—and who ultimately controls the future of this rapidly evolving
technology.
Del sits down with Dr.
Patrick Porter, inventor of
BrainTap
, to discuss
nervous system reset, focus, brain optimization, and mastering the mind in an
age of nonstop stress and technological overload.
Brain health expert and author Dr. Patrick Porter joins Del to discuss how
chronic stress, information overload, and modern technology are affecting
mental clarity and overall brain health.
Dr. Porter explains how the brain and nervous system respond to constant
stimulation and why sleep quality, breathing, and lifestyle habits play a
critical role in cognitive performance and emotional resilience.
He also shares practical strategies, from breathing and movement to emerging
brainwave technologies, that may help restore balance, sharpen focus, and
support long-term brain health in an increasingly demanding world.
Guests: Dr. Robert
Malone, Aaron Siri Esq., Dr. Patrick Porter
March 26, 2026